Venue: The Capesthorne Room - Town Hall, Macclesfield SK10 1EA. View directions
Contact: Sarah Baxter Tel: 01270 686462 Email: sarah.baxter@cheshireeast.gov.uk
Note: To register to speak on an application please email Speakingatplanning@cheshireeast.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies for Absence To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillors A Critchley and M Hunter. |
|||||||
Declarations of Interest/Pre Determination To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any disclosable pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests and for Members to declare if they have a pre-determination in respect of any item on the agenda. Minutes: In the interest of openness in respect of applications 20/4976M,21/1727W and 21/2240C, Councillor S Edgar declared that he was the Vice Chair of the Public Rights of Way Committee who were a consultee on the applications, however he had not discussed the matter.
In the interest of openness in respect of applications 20/4976M and 21/2240C, Councillor S Hogben declared that he was a non-Executive Director of ANSA who were a consultee, however he had not discussed the applications or made any comments on them.
In the interest of openness in respect of applications 20/4976M,21/1727W and 21/2240C, Councillor L Crane declared that she was the Chair of the Public Rights of Way Committee who were a consultee on the applications, however she had not discussed the matter.
In the interest of openness in respect of applications 20/4976M,21/1727W and 21/2240C, Councillor S Akers Smith declared that she was a member of the Public Rights of Way Committee who were a consultee on the applications, however she had not discussed the matter.
In the interest of openness in respect of application, 21/4440C, Councillor S Akers Smith declared that she knew the applicant. |
|||||||
Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 63 KB To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 22 December 2021 as a correct record. Minutes: RESOLVED
That the minutes of the meeting held on 22 December 2021 be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|||||||
Public Speaking A total period of 5 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for the following:
· Ward Councillors who are not members of the Strategic Planning Board · The relevant Town/Parish Council
A period of 3 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for the following individuals/groups:
· Members who are not members of the Strategic Planning Board and are not the Ward Member · Objectors · Supporters · Applicants Minutes: RESOLVED
That the public speaking procedure be noted. |
|||||||
To consider the above application. Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(Parish Councillor Nick Speakman, representing Ollerton with Marthall Parish Council and Justin Paul, the agent for the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be refused for the following reasons:-
1. The proposed development would represent inappropriate development within the Green Belt. Furthermore, additional harm would be created to the Green Belt by virtue of loss of openness and encroachment. It is not deemed that Very Special Circumstances exist that are sufficient to clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and the other harm identified. The development would therefore be contrary to Policy PG3 (Green Belt) of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy, saved Policy GC1 (Green Belt (New Buildings)) of the Macclesfield Borough Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
2. The proposed development would be located outside of a settlement boundary, in an unsustainable location. In addition, the development would lead to a concentration of specialist care facilities resulting in an imbalance of residential uses in the area and would conflict with other relevant policies of the development plan. The development is therefore deemed contrary to Policies SC4 (Residential Mix), SD2 (Sustainable Development Principles), CO1 (Sustainable Travel and Transport), EG2 (Rural Economy) and the strategic aims of Policy PG2 (Settlement Hierarchy) of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy and saved Policy DC57 (Community Uses – Residential Institutions) of the Macclesfield Borough Local Plan.
3. The proposed development would have a significant adverse impact upon roostingbats and Great Crested Newts, protected and priority species. The reasons for or benefits of the proposed development do not outweigh the adverse impacts of the proposed development upon these species and so the proposals are contrary to Policy SE3 (Biodiversity and Geodiversity) of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy and saved Policy NE11 (Nature Conservation) of the Macclesfield Borough Local Plan. As bats and Great Crested Newts receive protection under the Habitats Regulations, the Council must have due regard to the regulations during the determination of the application. In order to discharge its duties under the regulations the Council must consider whether Natural England would be likely to grant a protected species licence to allow the development to proceed. In this instance, the Council considers that the proposed development is not of imperative overriding public interest and there are suitable alternatives to the current proposals with a reduced impact upon bats and Great Crested Newts. The application therefore fails to comply with the licensing tests in the habitat regulations. Natural England would consequently be unlikely to grant a protected species license in this instance.
In order to give proper effect to the Strategic Planning Board’s intent and without changing the substance of its decision, authority is delegated to the Head of Planning in consultation with the Chair (or in their absence the Vice Chair) to correct any technical slip or omission in the resolution, before issue of the decision notice.
(It was noted that ... view the full minutes text for item 64. |
|||||||
To consider the above application.
Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(David Walton, the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That for the reasons set out in the report and in the written update to the Board the application be approved subject to the completion of a deed of variation of the Section 106 agreement attached to permission 8/08/0375/CPO to replicate the requirements of the legal agreement to the permission.
And subject to the following conditions:-
|
|||||||
To consider the above application.
Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(Michael Blackhurst, representing the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That for the reasons set out in the report the application be approved subject to the following conditions:-
1. Approved plans 2. Tree retention 3. Tree Protection 4. Arboricultural method statement 5. Levels survey – Trees 6. Services drainage layout – Trees 7. 10 year maintenance/retention of avenue trees 8. 25 year landscape management plan 9. The proposed development to proceed in accordance with the recommendations of the submitted Ecological Enhancement Strategy 10. Bird nesting season 11. Implementation of the recommendations in the acoustic report 12. Details of play areas including levels to be agreed 13. Details, including cross-sections of the slopes between the adjacent access roads and the far side of the 3 SUDS ponds, along the north eastern boundary to be submitted and approved.
In addition it was agreed that an informative be included which stated any reserved matters application was to leave a landscaped buffer zone to the road frontages and woodland areas along the southern boundary.
In the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Board’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Head of Planning has delegated authority to do so in consultation with the Chairman of the Strategic Planning Board, provided that the changes do not exceed the substantive nature of the Board’s decision.
(It was noted that Councillor B Murphy abstained from voting on the application. The meeting was adjourned for a short break). |
|||||||
To consider the above application.
Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
RESOLVED
That for the reasons set out in the report and in the written and verbal update to the Board, the application be approved subject to the completion of a Section 106 Agreement securing the following:-
1. Congleton Link Road contribution of £287,310 based on a £30sq.m commercial development. Payable on first occupation. 2. Bus service contribution of £150,000. Payable on first occupation. 3. Biodiversity net gain payment based on 2.30 additional biodiversity units (a total commuted sum of £25.3k.on current figures): · submit an updated Biodiversity Impact Assessment (BIA) based upon the final design, layout and detailed landscaping plans to be submitted and approved by the Council with the reserved matters submission; and · where the BIA shows an alternative credit amount is required, for this to be calculated based on an agreed formula for the indicative masterplan (£11k per credit required) and for this to be paid to the Council prior to occupation.
And subject to the following conditions:-
|
|||||||
To consider the above application.
Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(David Sweeting, the agent for the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That for the reasons set out in the report the application be approved subject to the following conditions:-
In order to give proper effect to the Board’s intentions and without changing the substance of the decision, authority is delegated to the Head of Planning in consultation with the Chair (or in his absence the Vice Chair) of Strategic Planning Board, to correct any technical slip or omission in the wording of the resolution, between approval of the minutes and issue of the decision notice.
|
|||||||
To consider the above application.
Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(Councillor Carol Bulman, the Ward Councillor, Fraser Ramsay, representing the applicant and Joseph Smith, the agent for the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That for the reasons set out in the report and in the written update to the Board, the application be approved subject to consideration of the hours of operation of the site and the ability for investigation of a local site for biodiversity net gain within the s106, subject the completion of a Section 106 Agreement securing the following:-
And subject to the following conditions:-
1. Time limit (3 years) 2. Development in accordance with the approved plans 3. Materials 4. No development other than site clearance works to take place prior to submission and approval of a detailed drainage plan 5. No development other than site clearance works to take place prior to submission and approval of surface water drainage details 6. No development other than site clearance works to take place prior to submission and approval of an archaeological written scheme of investigation 7. No development other than site clearance works to take place prior to submission and approval of a construction management plan 8. No development other than site clearance works to take place prior to submission and approval of Phase II ground investigations and risk assessments 9. The development shall not be occupied until a verification report (contaminated land) has been submitted 10. In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the approved development that was not previously identified, it shall be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment shall be undertaken and where necessary a remediation scheme shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Following the completion of any measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a validation report shall be submitted to and approved in writing of the Local Planning Authority prior to the occupation of any buildings. 11. Details of any external plant and machinery shall be submitted prior to installation 12. Provision of low emission boilers 13. Provision of electric vehicle charging points 14. Submission of details of any piling operations 15. Construction hours: 09:00 – 17:30hours Mon to Fri, 09:00 – 14:00 hours Sat, with no working on Sundays or public holidays 16. Submission and approval of a site specific dust management plan 17. Nesting bird protection 18. Provision of a construction environmental management plan (nature conservation) 19. Each reserved matters application to be supported by a strategy for the incorporation of features to enhance the biodiversity value of the proposed development 20. The development hereby approved shall only be occupied in connection with operations at British Salt 21. If the consented development has not commenced by the beginning of July 2022 an updated badger survey report is to be ... view the full minutes text for item 69. |