PDF 125 KBVenue: The Capesthorne Room - Town Hall, Macclesfield, SK10 1EA. View directions
Contact: Sarah Baxter Email: sarah.baxter@cheshireeast.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence To receive any apologies for absence Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillor M Hardy. |
|
|
Declarations of Interest/Pre Determination To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any personal and/or prejudicial interests and for Members to declare if they have pre-determined any item on the agenda. Minutes:
Councillor D Thompson declared that she had expressed an opinion in respect of application number 10/4558M - 6 Ashwood Road, Disley, Stockport, Cheshire, SK12 2EL: House Extension and Refurbishment Comprising - New Attic Conversion, New Rear Extension, New Raised Decking to Rear Garden, Internal Refurbishment, New Raised Car Park in Curtilage to Front Garden for Graham Prest and had therefore fettered her discretion. Councillor D Thompson exercised her separate speaking rights as a Ward Councillor and withdrew from the room during consideration of the item. |
|
|
Minutes of the Meeting To approve the Minutes as a correct record. Minutes: RESOLVED
That the minutes of the meeting be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. |
|
|
Public Speaking A total period of 5 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for Ward Councillors who are not Members of the Planning Committee.
A period of 3 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for the following individuals/groups:
Minutes: RESOLVED
That the public speaking procedure be noted. |
|
|
To consider the above planning application. Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(Councillor D Thompson, the Ward Councillor, Mrs Stewart, an objector and Mr Prest, the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:-
|
|
|
To consider the above planning application. Minutes: (During consideration of the application Councillor J B Crockatt left the meeting and returned. In accordance with the Code of Conduct he did not take part in the debate or vote on the application. In addition Councillor Miss C M Andrew left the meeting and did not return).
Consideration was given to the above application.
(Mr Silvester, an objector and Dr Cook, the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:-
(Prior to consideration of the following applciation Councillor Mrs L Smetham left the meeting and did not return). |
|
|
To consider the above planning application. Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
It was noted that under ‘Other Material Considerations’ on page 28 of the report, reference should have been made to PPG2: Green Belts and PPS5: Planning for the Historic Environment.
(Mrs Campbell, an objector and Mr Kershaw, representing the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be refused for the following reasons:-
The proposed replacement dwelling would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt. The development would cause additional harm in terms of harm to openness and character of Green Belt; and by virtue of the design being of insufficient quality to replace the existing heritage asset. The proposed fallback position of implementing extensions to the dwelling is not considered sufficient to clearly outweigh the identified harm and does not amount to a very special circumstance to justify permitting the development.
(This decision was against the Officers recommendation of approval). |
|
|
To consider the above planning application Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
It was noted that under Other Material Considerations’ on page 38 of the report, reference should have been made to PPG2: Green Belts and PPS5: Planning for the Historic Environment.
(Mrs Campbell, an objector and Mr Kershaw, representing the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be refused for the following reasons:-
The proposed replacement dwelling would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt. The development would cause additional harm in terms of harm to openness and character of Green Belt; and by virtue of the design being of insufficient quality to replace the existing heritage asset. The proposed fallback position of implementing extensions to the dwelling is not considered sufficient to clearly outweigh the identified harm and does not amount to a very special circumstance to justify permitting the development.
(As a result of the decision on the previous application, the Officers’ recommendation was amended to one of refusal). |
|
|
Planning Enforcement Performance To note a report detailing Enforcement Notices/Enforcement Action which was considered at a meeting of the Strategic Planning Board on 15 September 2010. Additional documents: Minutes: Consideration was given to the above report.
The Chairman advised that any Member who wanted to make comments on individual Enforcement cases should contact the Enforcement Service directly.
Mr P Hooley provided a verbal update on some of the cases and it was agreed that the update he had referred to would be emailed to Member of the Committee.
RESOLVED
That the report be noted. |
|
|
To note the Appeal Summaries. Minutes: Consideration was given to the Appeal Summaries.
RESOLVED
That the Appeal Summaries be noted. |