Venue: The Capesthorne Room - Town Hall, Macclesfield, SK10 1EA. View directions
Contact: Sarah Baxter
No. | Item |
---|---|
Code of Conduct - Declarations of Interest/Pre-Determination To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any personal and/or prejudicial interests and for Members to declare if they have made a pre-determination in respect of any item on the agenda. Minutes: Councillor J Crockatt declared a personal interest in application 09/088M – 48 Hobson Street, Macclesfield by virtue of the fact that he knew one of the objectors and in accordance with the Code of Conduct he remained in the meeting during consideration of the application.
Councillors Miss C M Andrew, J B Crockatt, H Davenport, Mrs E N Gilliland, Mrs T Jackson, W Livesley, R J Narraway, D Neilson, Mrs L Smetham, D Stockton, D Thompson, D A Neilson and R E West all declared a personal interest in application 09/0842m Broad Heath House, Slade Lane, Over Alderley, Macclesfield by virtue of the fact that they knew the person speaking on behalf of the applicants as he was the former Chief Planning Officer at Macclesfield Borough Council and in accordance with the Code of Conduct they remained in the meeting during consideration of the application.
Councillor Miss C M Andrew declared a further personal interest in the same application as one of the applicants was a member of Over Alderley Parish Council and on occasions she attended meetings of Over Alderley Parish Council. In accordance with the Code of Conduct she remained in the meeting during consideration of the application.
Councillor Mrs L Smetham also declared a further personal interest in the same application by virtue of the fact that the architect was a member of the Macclesfield Civic Society which she was also a member of and in accordance with the Code of Conduct she remained in the meeting during consideration of the application. |
|
Minutes of Previous meeting To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on Wednesday 20 May 2009. Minutes: RESOLVED
That the minutes be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. |
|
Public Speaking A total period of 5 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for Ward Councillors who are not Members of the Planning Committee.
A period of 3 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for the following individuals/groups:
Minutes: A total period of 5 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for Ward Councillors who are not Members of the Northern Planning Committee.
A period of 3 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for the following individuals/groups:
RESOLVED
That the public speaking procedure be noted. |
|
To consider the above application. Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(The Ward Councillor Mrs H M Gaddum and an objector attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be refused for reasons relating to design, loss of light, harm to residential amenity and harm to highway safety/convenience of road users due to lack of on-site parking.
(This decision was against the Officers recommendation of approval). |
|
To consider the above application. Minutes: This application was withdrawn prior to the meeting. |
|
09/0568M - Garden Room Extension, 20 Gaskell Avenue, Knutsford, Cheshire for Dr S Dean To consider the above application. Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(The Ward Councillor S Wilkinson, two objectors and the agent for the applicant attended the meeting spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be refused for reasons relating to the adverse impact on the character, appearance and historic interest of the listed building.
(This decision was against the Officers recommendation of approval). |
|
To consider the above application. Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
RESOLVED
That the application be refused for reasons relating to the adverse impact on the character, appearance and historic interest of the listed building.
(This decision was against the Officers recommendation of approval). |
|
To consider the above application. Minutes: Consideration was given to the above application.
(Two objectors and a representative speaking on behalf of the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That the application be deferred for a site visit in order to assess the impact of the development on the locality. |