To receive an overview of the Cheshire East Council final outturn for the financial year 2024/25.
Minutes:
The committee agreed that whilst improvement on the FR3 position was positive, the overspend of £9.8m remained a significant financial challenge for the council. It was noted that significant cost pressures in both Adults and Children’s services remained a key issue.
The committee queried the RAG ratings used in Annex 1 – Section 2 and how these had been applied. It was confirmed that:
- Red Rating: Low Confidence – there were significant issues and would likely to require additional decisions to bridge the gap.
- Amber Rating: Medium Confidence – savings proposals were at risk but could be recovered / mitigated within scope of original decision.
- Green Rating: High confidence that the saving proposal was on track with no concerns on the current forecast.
- Completed Rating: Saving proposal had been delivered and no further action was required.
It was noted that the council proposed to increase its general reserves position at outturn through borrowing £17.6m through EFS. Reassurance was sought on the interest rates being paid on EFS. It was confirmed that reserves would be increased through £5.3m Earmarked ‘Change Reserves’ to respond to the steps that would be necessary to support the delivery of the transformation change programme and improvement activity required through 2025-26 and 2026-27. £2.5m increase in the General Fund Reserves had been identified to increase financial resilience into 2025-26 and future years. However, the reserves were still not at an adequate level and the issue of financial sustainability remained a key risk. This had also been highlighted as a key risk by the External Auditors.
It was clarified that, if the above additions to Reserves of £7.8m were made at out-turn, the annual revenue budget saving against the Capital Financing Budget would be £250K p.a.
It was confirmed that the questions and detailed responses submitted by Councillor O’Leary would be circulated to the committee.
The committee noted the capital financing budget and anticipated interest costs on borrowing. The committee queried if the repayments were fixed or variable as having variable payments would make a significant difference to the cost to the council. Officers committed to providing a written response.
RESOLVED (unanimously):
Supporting documents: