Agenda item

14/4010C-Outline application for proposed residential development of up to 60 dwellings with access and all other matters reserved, Land to the East of Hassall Road, Alsager, Cheshire for Gladman Developments Ltd

To consider the above application.

Minutes:

Consideration was given to the above application.

 

(Councillor R Fletcher, the Ward Councillor, Town Councillor Derek Longhurst, representing Alsager Town Council, Sue Helliwell, representing Friends of Heath End, Mr J Rowland, an objector and Sue Helliwell, an objector attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).

 

RESOLVED

 

That the application be refused for the following reasons:-

 

1. The proposed residential development is unsustainable because it is located within the Open Countryside partly on Grade 2 Agricultural Land, contrary to Policies PS8 and H6 of the Congleton Borough Adopted Local Plan First Review 2005 and the principles of the National Planning Policy Framework and create harm to interests of acknowledged importance.

 

2. The proposed development would result in a harmful encroachment into the open countryside. The development would adversely impact upon the landscape character and does not respect or enhance the landscape when viewed from the local footpath network and the Salt Line Way. Therefore the proposed development is contrary to Policies GR1 and GR5 of the adopted Congleton Borough Local Plan First Review and guidance contained within the NPPF.

 

3. The traffic generated by this proposed development together with other committed developments in Alsager would have a severe impact upon the highway network in particular the junctions of Crewe Road/Sandbach Road and Hassall Road/Crewe Road. The proposed development would be contrary to Paragraph 32 of the NPPF and Policy GR9 of the Congleton Borough Local Plan First review 2005.

 

4. The proposed development when taken cumulatively with other committed developments in Alsager would exceed the spatial distribution of development for Alsager as identified within Policy PG6 (Spatial Distribution of Development) of the Local Plan Strategy Submission Version. This is supported by comments made by the Inspector at Paragraph 75 of the Inspectors Interim views on the legal compliance and soundness of the submitted Local Plan Strategy. As such the proposal would result in an unsustainable form of development.

 

In order to give proper effect to the Board’s intentions and without changing the substance of the decision, authority is delegated to the Head of Strategic & Economic Planning, in consultation with the Chairman (or in his absence the Vice Chairman) of Strategic Planning Board, to correct any technical slip or omission in the wording of the resolution, between approval of the minutes and issue of the decision notice.

 

Should the application be subject to an appeal, the following Heads of Terms should be secured as part of any S106 Agreement:

 

1.         A scheme for the provision of 30% affordable housing – 65% to be provided as social rent/affordable rent with 35% intermediate tenure. The scheme shall include:

- The numbers, type, tenure and location on the site of the affordable housing provision

- The timing of the construction of the affordable housing and its phasing in relation to the occupancy of the market housing

- The arrangements for the transfer of the affordable housing to an affordable housing provider or the management of the affordable housing if no Registered Social Landlord is involved

- The arrangements to ensure that such provision is affordable for both first and subsequent occupiers of the affordable housing; and

- The occupancy criteria to be used for determining the identity of occupiers of the affordable housing and the means by which such occupancy criteria shall be enforced.

2. Provision of Public Open Space and a LEAP (5 pieces of equipment) to be maintained by a private management company

3. Provision of a car-park (minimum of 14 spaces) to serve Borrow Pit Meadows to be maintained by Cheshire East Council

4. Primary School Education Contribution of £119,309

5. Highways Contribution of £46,154

6. PROW Contribution of £16,555

 

(This decision was contrary to the Officer’s recommendation of approval.  The meeting adjourned for a short break.  Prior to consideration of the following application, Councillor B Murphy left the meeting and did not return).

Supporting documents: