Agenda item

13/2224N-Proposed Residential Development of up to 120 Dwellings, Highway Works, Public Open Space and Associated Works, Land west of Audlem Road, Audlem, Cheshire for Gladman Developments Ltd

To consider the above application.

Minutes:

Consideration was given to the above application.

 

(Councillor Mrs J Clowes, the neighbouring Ward Councillor, Parish Councillor G Seddon, representing Audlem Parish Council, David Siddorns, representing Audlem Parish Planning Group/Village Design Statement Team and Heather Jones, representing Audlem Medical Practice, an objector attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).

 

RESOLVED

 

That the Board be minded to refuse the application for the following reasons:-

 

1.     The proposed residential development is unsustainable because it is located within the Open Countryside, where according to Policies NE.2 and RES.5 of the adopted Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Replacement Local Plan there is a presumption against new residential development. Such development would be harmful to its open character and appearance, which in the absence of a need for the development should be protected for its own sake. The Local Planning Authority can demonstrate a 5 year supply of housing land supply in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework. As such the application is also premature to the emerging Development Strategy. Consequently, there are no material circumstances to indicate that permission should be granted contrary to the development plan.

2.     In the absence detailed survey information the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposal will not result in loss of the best and most versatile agricultural land and given that the Authority can demonstrate a housing land supply in excess of 5 years, the applicant has also failed to demonstrate that there is a need for the development, which could not be accommodated elsewhere. The use of the best and most versatile agricultural land is unsustainable and contrary to Policy NE.12 of the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Replacement Local Plan 2011 and the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework.

3.     The proposal would involve the removal of an “important” hedgerow as defined in the Hedgerow Regulations 1997. Policy NE5 of the local plan states that the Local Planning authority will protect, conserve and enhance the natural conservation resource where, inter alia, natural futures such as hedgerows are, wherever possible, integrated into landscaping schemes on development sites. In the absence of overriding reasons for allowing the development and the proposal is therefore contrary to Policy NR3 of the adopted Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Replacement Local Plan 2011.

4.     Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that, at the proposed density, the scheme would provide for the retention and protection of existing trees of amenity value and therefore the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposal complies with Policy NE.5 (Nature Conservation and Habitats) of the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Replacement Local Plan 2011 and the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework.

5.     On the basis of the information submitted, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the scheme provides for a sufficiently high quality of design for buildings and public spaces which will function well and add to the overall quality of the area, not just for the short term but over the lifetime of the development. In so doing, the proposal will also fail to take the opportunities available for improving the character and quality of an area and the way it functions and to establish a strong sense of place, using streetscapes and buildings tocreate attractive and comfortable places to live and visit contrary to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework and policies BE2 (Design) and BE3 (Access and Parking) of the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Replacement Local Plan 2011

6.     Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that, at the proposed density, the scheme would provide for and adequate standard of amenity for existing and future occupiers and therefore the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposal complies with Policy BE1 (Amenity) of the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Replacement Local Plan 2011.

7.     The proposal fails to make adequate provision for infrastructure requirements and community facilities, in the form of medical provision, the need for which arises directly as a consequence of the development, contrary to policy BE 5 of the adopted Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Replacement Local Plan. It is therefore socially unsustainable contrary to the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Additionally, given the Appeal is proceeding to ensure appropriate provision of affordable housing and play space provision on site, it is also recommended that the Borough Solicitor be authorised to enter into a S106 Legal Agreement/ Unilateral Undertaking to secure:

 

·       £10,000 for speed limit changes

·       £261,483 for secondary education

·       Provision of on-site open space including skate park

·       Private residents management company to maintain all on-site open space

·       30% of the total dwellings as affordable with the tenure split of the affordable dwellings being 65% affordable rented and 35% intermediate.

·       Detailed scheme of size, number, tenures and types of affordable dwellings to be submitted with each phase of reserved matters

·       Affordable housing to be pepper-potted,

·       Affordable housing to be provided no later than occupation of 50% of the open market dwellings (or 80% if the development is phased and has high levels of pepper-potting),

·       Affordable housing to be built to meet the Design & Quality Standards required by the Homes & Communities Agency and meets Code for Sustainable Homes Level 3.

·       Affordable housing to be transferred to and managed by a Registered Provider as set out in the Housing Act 1996.

(Prior to consideration of the following item, Councillor Mrs Rachel Bailey arrived to the meeting and Councillor S Wilkinson left the meeting and did not return).

Supporting documents: