Agenda item

Sickness Absence Report

To consider a report of the Head of Human Resources and Organisational Development.

 

Minutes:

            Councillor D Flude attended the meeting and addressed the Committee in respect of this matter.

 

            The Committee considered a report of the Head of HR and Organisation Development relating to sickness absence in Cheshire East.

 

            The Committee was informed that during 2009/10, the average number of days lost due to sickness was 7.05. This had risen to 8.19 days during 2010/11.

 

            By way of comparison, a North West Employers survey carried out in April 2011 had determined that the average sickness absence rate for Unitary Councils in the North West was 9.15 days. The Chartered Institute of Personnel in its report into Absence Management for 2011 confirmed that for employers in public services with 5000 or more staff, the average number of days lost was 9.6 days and for private sector services was 11.8 days.

 

            Over sixty percent of all working days lost due to sickness was categorised as long term sickness and accounted for approximately a quarter of all the employees absent.  (Long term sickness was defined by the Council as 15 working days or more).

 

There were a number of contributory factors that may be leading to an increase in sickness absence statistics, including better reporting arrangements which had provided better accuracy; stress related to Council restructures, the ongoing challenging financial situation leading to further reviews and uncertainty for staff, and the recent review of staff terms and conditions of employment.

 

A number of measures were in place to address sickness rates including strategic intervention in the Waste and Recycling Service, and in addition, the Health and Safety Team had been involved in reminding employees of preventative measures in relation to injuries.

 

            The Attendance Management Policy would be reviewed with a view to simplifying the process and ensuring that the trigger points were appropriate in the circumstances and to support managers in taking action on attendance at a timely and early stage. 

 

            The HR Delivery Team would continue to provide coaching and training for managers in attendance management, both through the Corporate Training Programme and also on a local one-to-one or team basis as required and considered effective. This training would focus on the proactive management of attendance with a view to retaining employees in work and to support them in returning to work as soon as practicably possible.

 

            Additional proactive measures included:

 

 

·        A number of Health and Wellbeing events being held in May.

 

·        Close working with the Occupational Health Service to identify pro-active health promotion strategies and activities that could be rolled out across the Council and sustained in the longer term.

 

·        The possible introduction of an Employee Assistance Programme (EAP).  An EAP was a resource for employees to enable them to access support, usually in the form of counselling, to help them deal with difficult issues (whether work-related or in their personal life).

 

      The Committee was in favour of measures to provide support to staff during sickness absences, particularly those relating to alleviating the effects of stress, but felt that the target set for the average number of days sickness per employee should be lower than the existing target of 9 days.

 

RESOLVED –

 

(a)   That the report be received;

 

(b)   That the measures outlined in paragraphs 4.1 - 4.7 of the report be supported , particularly the proposals relating to the setting up of an Employee Assistance programme (EAP);

 

(c)   That the head of HR and Organisational Development be requested to consider introducing a new lower target than the existing 9 days for the average number of days sick leave taken by Cheshire East employees;

 

(d)   That subject to affordability, the Head of HR and Organisational development be requested to carry out a staff satisfaction survey as the last one was carried out in 2009.

 

 

 

 

 

Supporting documents: