Venue: Committee Suite 1,2 & 3, Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach CW11 1HZ. View directions
Contact: James Morley Scrutiny Officer
RESOLVED: that the minutes of the meeting held
on 13 September be approved as a correct record and signed by the
Declarations of Interest/Whipping Declarations
To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any personal and/or prejudicial interests in any item on the agenda
There were no members of the Committee present who wished to declare any interests.
Public Speaking Time/ Open Session
A total period of 15 minutes is allocated for members of the public to make a statement(s) on any matter that falls within the remit of the Committee.
Individual members of the public may speak for up to 5 minutes, but the Chairman will decide how the period of time allocated for public speaking will be apportioned, where there are a number of speakers
Mr John Jones, a member of the public, was present at the meeting and addressed the Committee. Mr Jones made references to the content of an article in the Crewe Chronicle on 19 October 2011 titled “Gypsies have changed, says leader”. Mr Jones went on to make his own comments related to the article.
To receive a presentation on the Cheshire East Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Planning Research from LDA Design, the consultants on the production of the report.
The Committee received a presentation on the Council’s Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Study from Rob Shaw who represented LDA Design, the consultants on the study. Elizabeth Cooper of LDA Design was also present to assist Rob.
The presentation by the LDA Design representatives summarised the content of the Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Study. The study was designed to inform the development of energy efficiency and renewable energy policies with the Local Development Framework (LDF). The study assessed the feasibility of delivering various types of renewable energy and the total implementable resource, taking account of constraints within the Borough.
The presentation briefly outlined several of the renewable energy technologies that were investigated as part of the study. Maps were used to show potential sites in Cheshire East for various technologies and diagrams illustrating the potential energy yield across the entire borough of each technology were shown.
The purpose of the Study was to identify the borough’s potential to inform the Council’s decision making. Potential for energy production was high and exceeded the future requirements of the borough. It would be the responsibility of the Council to decide where, when and which technology would be used to fulfil the needs of the borough in the future.
Following the presentation questions were asked and several points were made including:
There would have to be a balance between preserving the green belt
land and fulfilling the boroughs energy needs in the future. There
were also aesthetic considerations to take into account,
particularly in relation to the installation of wind turbines and
The study could be used to inform the decisions of private
organisations and community groups as well as the local authority.
The potential for sustainable energy production should be
considered when making planning decisions and designing new
buildings and residential areas.
That the Committee note the content of the Climate Change and
Renewable Energy Study as presented to the Committee.
The Planning Officer and LDA Design representatives left the meeting
To receive a briefing on the Housing Strategy to offer comments before it is presented to Cabinet for approval.
The Committee received a briefing on the proposed Housing Strategy to allow it to offer comments before it was presented to the Cabinet for approval. The Head of Planning and Housing gave a presentation to the Committee to outline the content of the Strategy document. The presentation covered the importance of housing, the key challenges and the five housing strategy priorities.
Members of the Committee asked questions and made comments about the Housing Strategy document. The points made included:
There were a lot of aspirations in the strategy document but no
mention of the resources that would be required to deliver on the
priorities of the Strategy or targets for delivery that could be
used to measure and scrutinise performance. The Committee accept
the priorities but should be able to measure progress towards
achievement of priorities as a Scrutiny Committee.
There should have been a scheme in place to offer incentives to
elderly and vulnerable people to downsize homes in order to free up
larger homes for families.
There was a lot of support for elderly and vulnerable people in
social housing but there should also be support for elderly and
vulnerable people in private sector housing and those who own their
It may be difficult to deliver affordable housing during the poor
economic climate due to people being unable to afford deposits for
houses and obtain mortgages. The Council should help residents with
finances and provide resources to increase the supply of affordable
· The five priorities were not weighted and were seen as equally important however the scope of some was larger than others. Limited resources meant it would be hard to deliver everything but the Council would endeavour to deliver on all of the priorities.
That the Committee endorse the adoption of a Housing
(b) That the Committee recommend the following amendments be made to the Housing Strategy document:
i. That greater recognition be given to renewable energy in the strategy document.
ii. That the wording of the “Meet the housing needs for a changing population” section needs to be strengthened to explain plans for downsizing older residents to smaller properties which should also include offering incentive schemes.
iii. That there be greater recognition of all tenures and not just social housing, especially for those just above the benefits threshold.
iv. That the strategy document include boosting support for elderly people with empty properties who wish to sell the property or, equally, rent it out.
v. That figures referring to the Crewe population be clarified.
vi. That the strategy makes specific reference to and takes account of the Council’s duty to support and care for 16+ care leavers, for whom the Council are Corporate parents.
vii. That the strategy include measures and targets for progress so that performance can be measured and scrutinised.
To receive a presentation on Gypsy and Traveller provision in Cheshire from the Cheshire Partnership Gypsy Traveller Co-ordinator.
The Committee received a presentation on provision for Gypsies and Travellers from the Cheshire Partnership Gypsy and Traveller Co-ordinator. The purpose of the presentation was to inform the Committee about the requirements for provision of Gypsy and Traveller sites in the borough, the issues with unauthorised encampments and developments and the measures that were being taken to improve the relationships between Gypsy & Traveller communities and the local settled communities.
Questions were asked and points were made including:
Officers were currently working on recording officer time and
finding out the costs to Cheshire East of dealing with unauthorised
encampments and transit sites. Costs tended to be a lot higher for
those local authorities that did not have a dedicated co-ordination
A “pitch” was considered to be the space required for
one family. This was not definitive as needs varied between
families however there were expectations about what it was
necessary to provide space for. A target of between 27-42
additional pitches was set for Cheshire East between 2006 and 2011
which the Council has failed to reach. There is also a target for
between 19 and 22 additional pitches to be made available between
2011 and 2016.
It would have been much more effective to be proactive and in
control of encampments and transit sites than to be reactive to
Unauthorised sites. Accepted site provision needed to be improved
and would improve control, relations between travellers and the
settled community and generate income for the local
· The planning process for proposed sites needed to be more transparent and communication between traveller and settled communities needed to be developed in order to improve relationships and acceptance of encampments. The Council should take the lead on educating and improving communication and understanding between both sides.
(a) That the Cheshire Partnerships Gypsy and Travellers Co-ordinator be thanked for attending and the presentation be noted.
The Cheshire Partnership Gypsy and Traveller Co-ordinator left the meeting.
To give consideration to the Work Programme
The Committee gave consideration to the Work Programme.
(a) That the current Work Programme is agreed.