Issue - meetings

To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any disclosable pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests and for Members to declare if they have a pre-determination in respect of any item on the agenda.

In the interests of openness, Councillor Smetham declared that with regard to application number 21/0289M, she was acquainted with Henbury Parish Councillor David Nuttall and had briefly acknowledged him on her way into the meeting and was aware that the current application had been discussed by the Parish Council, but had not discussed or made any comments on this or the previous application and had expressed no interest at the site visit with the developer on the previous application.

In the interests of openness, Councillor Jefferay declared that with regard to application number 21/4669M, he had met with the Case Officer for the Ward and that he knows two of the speakers on this application, and a lot of the residents, some of whom have objected to the application. He had received correspondence relating to a single procedural matter which was forwarded on to the Case Officer, but had not pre-determined the application.  There had been no lobbying towards him on the matter.

In the interests of openness, Councillor MacFarlane declared that with regard to application number 21/4669M he and his wife live near to the proposed site and are not affected in any way visually but had not pre-determined the application.

In the interests of openness, Councillor Mannion declared during consideration of application number 21/0289M that Henbury parish adjoins his ward and that he knows several of the Henbury parish councillors, including Councillor Nuttall, who was speaking on this application, but he had not discussed or made any comments on this application.