13/3575M-Proposed erection of a marquee at Mottram Hall Hotel (resubmission), Mottram Hall Hotel, Wilmslow Road, Mottram St Andrew, Macclesfield for Andrew O'Brien, De Vere Hotels & Leisure
Meeting: 09/10/2013 - Strategic Planning Board (Item 85)
PDF 371 KBTo consider the above application.
Minutes:
Consideration was given to the above application.
(Councillor P Findlow, the Ward Councillor, Mrs Thelma Jackson, an objector and Robert Cook, CEO of De Vere Hotels, the applicant attended the meeting and spoke in respect of the application).
RESOLVED
That for the reasons set out in the report and in the oral update to Board the application be approved subject to the following conditions:-
1. A03FP - Commencement of development (3 years)
2. A06EX - Materials as application
3. A04TR - Tree pruning / felling specification
4. Time limit of 4 years from 1st occupation
5. Prior to 1st occupation, submission of a scheme in repsect of the operation of the demountable arm
6. The hours of operation of the marquee shall be limited to 08.00 to 24.00 Monday to Thursday, and 08.00 to 00.30 on Friday to Sunday including Public Holidays, with the exception of New Years Eve, where the hours shall be limited to 08.00 to 01.00.
In the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Board’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add addition conditions / informatives / planning obligations or reasons for approval / refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Planning and Place Shaping Manager in consultation with the Chairman of the Strategic Planning Board is delegated the authority to do so, provided that he does not exceed the substantive nature of the Board’s decision.
(The meeting adjourned for a short break. During the break the Senior Lawyer felt that further clarification was required regarding the additional condition relating to noise which Members had requested be included as a further condition. After the adjournment it was explained to Members that to simply add a condition relating to noise was unsatisfactory and that further explanation of what the noise condition should be was needed. Members came to an agreement on how the noise condition should be worded and for the avoidance of any doubt the vote was retaken).