Issue - meetings

To consider a response to the recommendations of the joint scrutiny Task and Finish Group following its review of the Council’s Home to School Transport Policy, and to the recommendations of the minority report.

In accordance with rule 13.1 of the Scrutiny Procedure Rules, the Chairman of the Children and Families Scrutiny Committee has been consulted and has agreed to waive the call-in provisions in relation to this decision on the grounds that any delay, caused by the call-in process, would be likely to seriously prejudice the Council’s or the public’s interest in this matter.

The Call In process would also significantly limit the Councils ability to support schools and colleges to find suitable alternatives for September 2012. Secondly, it would significantly prejudice the public’s ability to seek alternatives in terms of transport and alternative schools should they wish to change schools. Thirdly, taking into consideration thatthe savings resulting from the withdrawal of entitlement on the grounds of religion/faith in 2012/13 are being redirected to provide one-off funding to the affected educational establishments, any delay would prejudice the ability of those establishments to make the necessary alternative arrangements for September 2012. 

Consideration was given the recommendations of the joint scrutiny Task and Finish Group, and to the recommendations of the minority report, following a review of the home to school transport policy.  Following initial consideration of the matter by the Cabinet in July 2011 a joint Task and Finish Group had been established to review the potential impacts of changes on children with special educational needs, and for children currently entitled to support under the Council’s denominational and post 16 transport policies.

The Portfolio Holder for Children and Family Services gave a detailed resume of the position leading to the recommendations now being considered, including reference to the scrutiny review, the need to act equitably to the parents of pupils at both faith and non faith schools, and of the measures being put in place to provide support for young people wishing to remain in education beyond the statutory school age. 

Cabinet was informed that since the report had been circulated recommendation (2) had been amended to include the wording “this money is to be ringfenced accordingly” at the end of the first sentence.

A number of visiting Councillors spoke on the matter and there was a wide ranging debate during which the points covered included welcoming the arrangements to be made for post 16 transport, concern that the finance available for post 16 transport would not be enough to cover their costs for a whole year; concern at the introduction of the revised policy with effect from September 2012 and the effect this could have on any parents who had made a decision regarding their child’s school based on the terms of the existing transport policy, the reliability of the figures on which the calculations had been based, and that alternative money saving measures had not been fully investigated.

In considering the recommendations now made it was requested that the additional wording regarding ringfencing should be added to recommendation (3) as well as to (2); the Portfolio Holder agreed that this could be done.

The Chairman thanked all those members who  ...  view the full minutes text for item 147