Agenda and minutes

To receive apologies for absence.

Apologies were received from Councillors R Bailey and A Kolker.  Councillors J Clowes and S Gardiner attended as substitutes.

To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests, other registerable interests, and non-registerable interests in any item on the agenda and for Members to declare if they have pre-determined any item on the agenda.

There were no declarations of interest.

To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 6 March 2023.

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the meeting held on 6 March 2024 be approved as a correct record.

A total period of 5 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for the following:

·                Ward Councillors who are not members of the Planning Committee

·                The relevant Town/Parish Council

A total period of 3 minutes is allocated for each of the planning applications for the following:

·                Members who are not members of the planning committee and are not the Ward Member

·                Objectors

·                Supporters

·                Applicants

The public speaking procedure was noted.

To consider the above planning application.

Consideration was given to the above planning application.

The following attended the meeting and spoke in relation to the application:

Burland and Acton Parish Councillor Sue Stott, Dr Deb Ravenscroft (objector), Claire Lewis-Jones (objector) and Philip Percival (supporter).

RESOLVED:

That the application be REFUSED for the following reasons:

1.             The proposed development is unsustainable because it is located within the Open Countryside and does not meet any of the exceptions noted for development within Open Countryside. The proposed development would also cause harm to the open countryside/local landscape through urbanisation and countryside encroachment contrary to Policies SE1 (Design), PG6 (Open Countryside), SD1 (Sustainable Development in Cheshire East) & SD2 (Sustainable Development Principles), SE2 (Efficient Use of Land) of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy, GEN1 (Design) and the principles of the SADPD, ENV3: Open Countryside, DEV1 Design for New Development, DEV3 Location of Housing of the AEHNDP, the National Planning Policy Framework, which seek to ensure development is directed to the right location and open countryside is protected from inappropriate development and maintained for future generations enjoyment and use.

2.             The proposed development by reason siting, design and appearance would cause harm to the setting/character/appearance of the Conservation Area, Listed Buildings and Historic Registered Park. This harm would be at the lower to middle end of less than substantial harm when considered individually, however cumulatively the impact on all the heritage assets would be considerable which leads to a conclusion that the harm would be on the higher end of less than substantial. This harm is not considered to be outweighed by the public benefits and is therefore contrary to Polices SE1 (Design), SD1 (Sustainable Development in Cheshire East) & SD2 (Sustainable Development Principles), SE7 (Historic Environment) of the CELPS, HER3 (Conservation areas), HER4 (Listed buildings), HER5 (Registered parks and gardens) of the SADPD, Policy ENV2: valued Features and Characteristics, HER1 Heritage Assets, HER2 Acton Conservation Area, HER3 Chester Canal Conservation Area of the AEHNDP the NPPF, Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Strategy 28th June 2007 and Enabling Development and Heritage Assets 30th June 2020.

3.             The proposed development does not provide the required level of Public Open Space to create a sustainable development. The proposed development is contrary to Policy SD1 (Sustainable Development in Cheshire East) & SD2 (Sustainable Development Principles), SE6 (Green Infrastructure) of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy.

4.             The submitted ecological surveys/assessments are out of date given the time passed since they were undertaken and the Biodiversity metric calculation submitted with the application uses an outdated version of the metric spreadsheet and should be based upon an updated UK Habitats survey and condition assessment. In absence of this insufficient information has been provided in support of the application to consider the full ecological impacts associated with the development. The proposal would also have an adverse impact upon an area of Wood Pasture and Parkland priority habitat with a corresponding significant loss of biodiversity. As a result, insufficient information has been provided to consider the full ecological impacts  ...  view the full minutes text for item 76.

To consider the above planning application.

Consideration was given to the above planning application.

RESOLVED:

That for the reasons set out in the report the application be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions:

1               Time (3 years)

2               Plans

3               Materials as per application.

In order to give proper effect to the Committee’s intent and without changing the substance of its decision, authority is delegated to the Head of Planning (Regulation) in consultation with the Chair of the Southern Planning Committee, or in their absence the Vice Chair, to correct any technical slip or omission in the resolution, before issue of the decision notice.