Agenda, decisions and minutes

Meeting of Portfolio Holder for Housing Planning and Regeneration
Friday, 5th October, 2018 2.30 pm

Venue: The Capesthorne Room - Town Hall, Macclesfield SK10 1EA. View directions

Contact: Rachel Graves 

Link: Audio recording

Items
No. Item

1.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

There were no apologies for absence.

2.

Declarations of Interest

To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any disclosable pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests in any item on the agenda.

Minutes:

No declarations of interest were made.

3.

Public Speaking Time/Open Session

A period of 10 minutes is usually allocated for public speaking at the Council’s committee meetings. Given the significant public interest in the matter to be considered at this meeting, a period of 20 minutes has been allocated for public speaking. Individual members of the public may speak for up to 5 minutes. However, where there are more than four people wishing to speak, the Portfolio Holder, as the person presiding at the meeting, will determine how the time will be allocated among the speakers.

 

Those attending the meeting may choose to nominate a spokesperson to speak on their behalf if they consider that this will enable the public speaking time to be used more effectively. If one spokesperson is nominated, there would be no restriction on the time allowed for them to speak within the 20 minute period

 

Members of the public are not required to give notice to use this facility. However, as a matter of courtesy, a period of 24 hours’ notice is encouraged.

 

 

 

Minutes:

Debbie Jamison, Secretary of Knutsford Residents in Over Ward addressed the meeting and requested that authority not be given to the assets team to dispose of the blue land as it was not surplus to requirements, was against the expert opinion of the Open Spaces Society and had not yet proved absolutely necessary and that the matter should be dealt with through the planning process.  

 

Jeff Gazzard, Chair of Knutsford Residents in Over Ward, addressed the meeting and suggested that the covenant on the green land could be broken for the right reasons to get access to the development site and that there was no need to dispose of the blue land for access.

 

Adam Keppel-Green, Town Clerk of Knutsford Town Council, stated that the Town Council was opposed to the disposal of the blue land. The discharge of the covenant had not been fully explored and until this had been done the Town Council could not support the loss of public open space.

 

Councillor Tony Dean, Ward Councillor for Knutsford, stated he was generally in favour of the proposal. He understood that it was not an option to negotiate the covenant as some of the beneficiaries were not minded to give it up and asked if this was true.

4.

Proposed Disposal of Public Open Space Land at Longridge, Knutsford pdf icon PDF 110 KB

To consider the options and issues in respect of a thin strip of land subject to a covenant (referred to as the Green Land) and the disposal of a strip of land to enable access across other land (referred to as the Blue Land) at Longridge, Knutsford.

 

Additional documents:

Decision:

That, after having considered the objections and representations received as a result of the statutory process of advertising the Council’s intention to dispose of the land identified in the statutory notices (or any part or parts of that land) and after considering the further work undertaken with regard to the viability of allowing access to LPS 38 over the Green land and considering the representations received in this regard, the Council is to proceed with the disposal of all or any part of the Green land and part of the Blue land. Reasonable endeavours are to be used to minimise the Blue land disposed of for the access road. Such disposals are to be subject to planning.

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder considered the options and issues in respect of a thin strip of land subject to a covenant (referred to as the Green land) and the disposal of a strip of land to enable access across other land (referred to as the Blue land) at Longridge/North Ridge, Knutsford.

 

Cabinet at its meeting on 10 October 2017 had considered a report exploring the potential for enabling access to a development site at Longridge, Knutsford, known, as LPS38 in the Local Plan. 

 

Cabinet had resolved that the Executive Director of Place explore further options for facilitating access to the site over the covenanted ‘Green land’ and undertake further consultation on the same whilst concurrently advertise the intention to dispose of public open space land ‘Green land’ and ‘Blue land’ in accordance with the Local Government Act, and that the Portfolio Holder give due consideration to any representations made in response to the advertisement and decide whether or not to dispose of any or all of the ‘green’ or ‘blue’ land.

 

The Council had published the public open space disposal notices for two consecutive weeks in the local press on 23 November and on 30 November 2017 to confirm its intention to dispose of the land.  A further notice was published with an amended plan on 14 December and 21 December 2017.  In addition the information was made available at the Council Offices in Sandbach and on the Council’s website.  Knutsford Town Council were briefed in relation to the notices.  The draft Portfolio Holder report was published on 17 July 2018 for a period of 28 days to allow an additional opportunity to make further representations.

 

The report before the Portfolio Holder detailed the following:

 

Appendix 1

Plan of Site, as per the Cabinet report of 10 October 2017

Appendix 2

Resolution of Cabinet 10 October 2017

Appendix 3

Representations (redacted) received in response to the public open space disposal notices

Appendix 4

Revised Plan of Site - published with public open space disposal  notices on 14 and 21 December 2017

Appendix 5

Collation of Objections received to all public open space disposal notices

Appendix 6

List of Objections

Appendix 7

Grounds of Objections and Representations

Appendix 8

Briefing Report on Covenant on Green land

Appendix 9

Representations (redacted) received in response to publication of draft Portfolio Holder Report

Appendix 10

Summary of redacted representations on draft Portfolio Holder Report

 

The extent of the lands referred to in the decision was defined on the plan at Appendix 4.  The anticipated extent of the land to be disposed of, subject to planning, was indicated by a blue dashed line on Appendix 1 and was indicatively 4% of the blue land shown in Appendix 1.

 

External legal advice and Counsel advice had been sought in relation to the covenant on the green land and whether access across the land was feasible given the restrictions on the use of the land.  The advice received was that the building of a structure would be a  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.