Issue - meetings

To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any personal and/or prejudicial interests and for Members to declare if they have pre-determined any item on the agenda.

Councillor R E West declared a personal and prejudicial interest in application 10/4254M-Variation of Conditions 1 & 2 from Approval 5/5/5116 to allow Maximum of 12 Caravans to be occupied between 1st March and 15th January annually, The Caravan Site, Elm Beds Farm, Elm Beds Road, Poynton for Mr Victor Whittaker by virtue of the fact that he had a close relationship with one of the objectors to the application and in accordance with the Code of Conduct he left the meeting prior to consideration of the application.

Councillor R J Narraway declared a personal interest in applications 10/4083M-Variation of Conditions 9,10, 12 Relating  To 06/2254P (Appeal Decision App/C0630/A/07/2033939). The Purpose of this application is to ensure one of the Units can be occupied full time by a Manager including during the closed season, Rode Heath Wood, Back Lane, Eaton for Mr & Mrs Noad, 10/3803M-Application to remove condition 12 on Planning Permission 06/2254P (Appeal reference APP/C0630/A/07/20339390) for change of use of land to allow siting of 32 timber clad twin unit Caravans, access works and landscaping, Rode Heath Wood, Back Lane, Eaton for Mr David & Mrs Yvette Noad, 10/3805M- Application to remove condition 3 on Planning Permission 09/1509M (Appeal reference APP/R0660/A/10/2121609/NWF) for change of use of land to allow siting of 32 timber clad twin unit Caravans, access works and landscaping, Rode Heath Wood, Back Lane, Eaton for Mr David & Mrs Yvette Noad and 10/3805M- Application to remove condition 3 on Planning Permission 09/1509M (Appeal reference APP/R0660/A/10/2121609/NWF) for change of use of land to allow siting of 32 timber clad twin unit Caravans, access works and landscaping, Rode Heath Wood, Back Lane, Eaton for Mr David & Mrs Yvette Noad by virtue of the fact that he was a Member of North Rode Parish Council that had considered the applications, however he had not participated in any of the debates.  In accordance with the Code of Conduct he remained in the meeting during consideration of the applications.