Decisions

Publication of the annual Part 1 Brownfield Land Register Update

To apply the Council’s common seal to a Deed of Variation.

The Deed of Variation arises from a Contract Modification procedure. Please see fully approved Contract Modification form provided at Appendix One.

NOTE: This decision includes approval to enter into any property licence/lease considered necessary for the operational of the Mobile HWRC service, which will form part of the Deed of Variation.

i.That the Visitor Economy Manager, is put forward as a BID Board Member as the CEC representative.
ii.That no additional advisory officer attends and the Visitor Economy Manager provides signposting to advice as needed from other services.

The Director of Growth and Enterprise has reviewed the Draft Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2026-2036 consultation materials in conjunction with Chair and Vice Chair of Committee and has approved the materials for publication. This included a suite of documents, including the Draft document embedded in an online consultation portal form, the evidence base comprising network assessment and demand assessment, and a poster. The consultation is scheduled to be launched on 2 nd March 2026.

The Committee considered an update on the Procurement Pipeline, which provided an overview of forthcoming procurement activity and significant contracts requiring renewal across the Council.

The Committee noted the scale and complexity of the upcoming programme, including major contracts relating to social care, agency staffing, transport services, energy supply and capital infrastructure schemes. The report highlighted the importance of forward planning in securing value for money, ensuring compliance with procurement legislation, and supporting the Council’s financial sustainability.

The Committee raised the following points/queries:

·         Regarding the waivers reported at paragraph 11, an apparent inconsistency between the six waivers listed in the accompanying table and the eleven referenced earlier in the report was noted.  Concerns were also expressed about the overall use of waivers and asked whether procedures were in place to reduce their frequency, noting that levels in 2023/24 appeared unusually high, but that some earlier peaks were likely attributable to pandemic?related pressures.  In response, officers explained that the Council carried out over 3,000 procurement activities annually, and while they would prefer to see no waivers, the small number reported generally related to situations where only one suitable provider existed.  Greater concern was expressed over instances of non?adherence to Contract Procedure Rules (CPRs), three of which were reported and attributed to timing issues rather than deliberate non?compliance.  Officers confirmed that lessons?learned processes were in place to prevent recurrence.

·         Concerns were raised in relation to late identification of contract renewals leading to urgent extensions, particularly in sensitive service areas.

·          A query was raised regarding inconsistencies in contract dates shown in the contract register (page 297).  Officers advised that these appeared to be administrative errors, but this would be clarified in writing.

Following consideration of part?two matters, the meeting returned to part one.

RESOLVED (unanimously):

That the Finance Sub-Committee:

1.    Approve the pipeline of procurement activity in Appendix 1 of the report.

2.    Note the reason for 6 waivers approved between 1 August 2025 and 30 November 2025 (11 in total for 2025/26).

3.    Note the reason for 3 non-adherences between 1 August 2025 and 30 November 2025.

4.    Note the contracts awarded since April 2025, Appendix 2 of the report.

5.    That the report be presented to the next meeting of the Audit and Governance Committee for assurance with regards procurement waiver compliance and reporting.

The Committee considered the Third Financial Review (FR3) for 2025/26, which reported a forecasted balanced outturn position for the year, representing a £2.345m improvement since FR2 (achieved after applying £25.261m of Exceptional Financial Support (EFS)).

Members noted continued significant pressures, particularly the £8.195m overspend in Children and Families driven by placement and staffing costs, alongside a £12.037m shortfall in cross?directorate Transformation savings. It was reported that the pressures were partially offset by a £7.412m favourable variance in the Place Directorate, mainly due to vacancy management and one?off income.

The Capital Programme had forecasted to spend £148.093m, an underspend against the revised programme, while the Council’s reserves were projected to reduce to £26.632m, with the planned £1.304m contribution to the General Fund not achievable.

Key financial risks noted included rising placement costs, winter pressures in Adults’ Services, agency staffing, and the scale of the Dedicated Schools Grant deficit (£147.966m forecast).

The Committee welcomed the balanced budget but noted that it depended on Exceptional Financial Support and an accounting override related to the DSG.  Consideration was given to service performance in relation to the delivery of transformation savings and the importance of transformation management, resource and delivery planning.

The Committee questioned the effectiveness and cost of the transformation programme and the accuracy of FR3 forecasting; concerns were raised in relation to ongoing capital underspending.  Members requested a standalone review to understand the more long?term impacts of this.  Officers supported the suggestion of a separate member working group of the capital programme, noting the significant link between capital delivery and revenue planning, and would look into this.  Officers confirmed FR3 forecasts used the best available information, with improving accuracy later in the year.  Updated capital figures had been shared and would be further refined for FR4.

The Committee referred to Adults and Health and highlighted winter?related increases in Adult Social Care demand and asked whether this and NHS financial pressures were factored into forecasts.  Officers confirmed that seasonal pressures were included in the forecasts and that NHS and Council responsibilities remained clearly defined.  Any issues around cost allocation would be addressed with partners.

The Committee raised concerns that although there had been improvements, significant pressures remained across the piece.

The Committee welcomed the reports and thanked the officers for their ongoing work.

RESOLVED (unanimously):

That the Finance Sub-Committee:

1.    Note

a)    the factors leading to a forecast balanced position

b)    the contents of Annex 1, Section of the report

c)    progress on the delivery of the MTFS approved budget policy change items

d)    the RAG ratings and latest forecasts

e)    the actions to be taken to address any adverse variances from the approved budget.

2.    Note the in-year forecast capital spending of £148.093m against an original capital budget (at out-turn) of £208.491m.

3.    Recommend to Council to approve the Supplementary Revenue Estimate Request for Allocation of Additional Grant Funding over £1,000,000 as per Annex 1, Section 3, Table 1 of the report.

4.    Note that the Children and Families Committee will be asked to approve the Supplementary Revenue Estimate Requests for Allocation of Additional Grant Funding over £500,000 and up to £1,000,000 as per Annex 1, Section 3, Table 1 of the report.

5.    Note the approved Supplementary Capital Estimates and Capital Virements up to £500,000 as per Annex 1, Section 4, Table 3 of the report.

6.    Note that Service Committees will be asked to approve the Supplementary Capital Estimates above £500,000 and up to £1,000,000 as per Annex 1, Section 4, Table 4 of the report.

7.    Note the Capital Virements above £500,000 up to and including £5,000,000 to be approved in accordance with the Council’s Constitution as per Annex 1, Section 4, Table 4 of the report.

8.    Recommend to Council to approve the Supplementary Capital Estimate Request over £1,000,000 as per Annex 1, Section 4, Table 5 of the report.

9.    Approve the Capital Virements above £5,000,000 as per Annex 1, Section 4, Table 5 of the report.

10. Note the Capital Budget Reductions as per Annex 1, Section 4, Table 6 of the report.

11. Note the available reserves position as per Annex 1, Section 5 of the report.

The Committee considered an update on the development of the Medium?Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) for 2026–2030, including the impact of the Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement received on 17 December 2025.

The Committee noted that the revised budget position incorporated a £6.104m net improvement in funding for 2026/27, following grant consolidation and updated government allocations. The report highlighted challenge?session refinements to growth and savings proposals, updated capital financing requirements, the rephasing of elements of the Transformation Programme, and revisions to pay and inflation assumptions.

The Committee reviewed the summary findings of the public budget consultation, including stakeholder engagement and survey results, and acknowledged the continuing budget gap of £30.950m for 2026/27, which included the previously approved one?off Exceptional Financial Support (EFS) requirement.

The Committee noted that, in relation to Council Tax, raising the referendum limit would help to address the Council’s budget gap by generating £15.5m next year and reducing future gaps to manageable levels.  Without flexibility, if granted, a full capitalisation direction and accelerated capital receipts would be required.  Historical decisions not to maximise Council Tax, taken with the best of intent, had created a £22.4m shortfall.

The Committee raised the following points/queries, particularly in relation to a proposed increase in Council Tax payments:

·         The impact on residents: Council Tax was a regressive tax; above inflation increases hit hardest those least able to afford it.  It particularly hit those with incomes that were above the Council Tax benefit threshold, but below 60% of medium income.  It was assumed that most of those households would be concentrated in Crewe and parts of Macclesfield.  It was queried how many households would fall into that group and what the effect on disposable income would be if the Council were to increase Council Tax by 9.99%.  In response, it was agreed that officers would provide a written response.

·         The Council offered ongoing financial support.  Officers confirmed that the Crisis and Resilience Fund (previously the Household Support Fund) provided support; the Council Tax Support (CTS) scheme was also in place.  Guidance to accompany Council Tax bills had been updated; additional support to residents also included signposting to wider financial?support options.

·         The implications of the local government settlement.

·         The amount of EFS provided by the government.

·         The officers’ professional recommendation on the 9.99% Council Tax flexibility.

·         The scale of service cuts required without a raise in Council Tax, and the level of confidence in service budgets.

·         The concerns raised by residents on the proposed Council Tax increase, particularly in areas with higher band properties.

·         Assurances were sought that the budget was deliverable given past underperformance, rising borrowing, and residents’ concerns.  Officers advised that all proposals now had delivery plans and business cases in place, unlike in previous years, and reiterated the need for transparent communication and realistic planning.

·         The potential impact on building the Council’s reserves if permission to increase the referendum limit was not granted.

·         The role of scrutiny and impending changes in the Council’s governance framework.  Consideration was given to pre-decision scrutiny and corporate scrutiny matters.

·         The Council’s core spending power had increased by 60.7% since 2015, which was higher than the national average of 54.5%, and higher than inflation at 44%.

·         Concerns around the Transformation Programme, in particular the financial costs and delivery timescales involved; activity could be reviewed by the Audit and Governance Committee.  Assurance in the ability to achieve savings going forward was felt to be required if residents were going to be asked to provide an additional 9.99% in their Council Tax.

·         Cheshire East’s Council Tax base remained lower than neighbouring authorities due to historic freezes and use of reserves, and that even with a 9.99% increase it would still be comparatively low.

·         The progress updates to Members on the Transformation Programme were welcomed. 

·         The importance of making clear financial and performance information accessible to the public was highlighted.

·         Previous decisions to freeze increases in Council Tax payments were taken on advice provided at the respective time.

·         Several factors had contributed to the Council’s current financial position, including: inflation outpacing Council Tax increases, historic reserve movements, and the need to review the Council Tax support scheme to protect vulnerable residents.

RESOLVED (by majority):

That the Finance Sub-Committee:

1.    Note the updated budget position for the period 2026/27 to 2029/30 as set out in Table 3 of the report.

2.    Note the outcome of the Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement received on 17 December 2025 (paragraphs 9-14 of the report).

3.    Review the summary results from the Budget Consultation survey which ran from November to 17 December 2025 as contained in paragraphs 26-33 of the report.

4.    Recommend the list of 2026/27 budget change proposals as contained in Annex 2 of the report onto Corporate Policy Committee (12 February 2026) for inclusion in the final budget to be approved at full Council on 25 February 2026.

5.    Note the submissions made for an application for Exceptional Finance Support (paragraph 20 of the report).

6.    Recommend to Corporate Policy Committee (12 February 2026) to consider recommending to Full Council an increase in Council Tax as one of the tools to set a balanced budget, if granted the ability to raise Council Tax above the current referendum thresholds by Ministry of Housing Communities & Local Government (MHCLG).

At this point in the meeting, the Committee adjourned for a short break.

The Committee considered the report in relation to the catering provision contract at Tatton Park, held by Tatton Park Enterprises Ltd (TPE Ltd).  The Committee noted that the report proposed a 12?month extension of the catering services contract with TPE Ltd from 16 April 2026 to 15 April 2027.

Members noted that TPE Ltd, a wholly owned Council company established in 2012, continued to deliver a successful and resilient catering operation despite ongoing pressures in the hospitality sector, and that alternative delivery model, such as bringing the service in?house or outsourcing, presented greater financial, operational and service?quality risks.  It was highlighted that the extension would align with work underway on Tatton Park’s Target Operating Model and maintain continuity, brand alignment, and financial contribution.

The Committee raised the following points/queries:

·         Regarding staffing implications, officers confirmed that TPE Ltd and Tatton Park staff would be kept informed throughout the review process.

·         Clarification was sought in relation to recommendation 2 and the delegation of contract extensions for TPE Ltd to the Head of Rural and Cultural Economy Service.  It was queried whether this referred only to the current contract being discussed, or whether it would also apply to further extensions going forward.  In response, officers advised that it could cover some further short extensions or adaptations to align with the developing target operating model, noting that any significant changes would be reported to Cabinet and that decisions would be made in consultation with the relevant Portfolio Holder.

During consideration of this item, prior to the vote being taken, Councillor D Brown joined the meeting (10:37 a.m.).

RESOLVED (By majority):

That the Finance Sub-Committee:

1.    Agree that the contract with Tatton Park Enterprises Ltd for the catering provision at Tatton Park be extended for a further one year from the 16th April 2026 to the 15th April 2027.

2.    Delegate contract extensions for TPE Ltd to the Head of Rural and Cultural Economy Service in discussion with the Executive Director of Place, to ensure alignment with the development of the Target Operating Model for Tatton Park.

The Committee considered the report on the proposed freehold disposal of approximately 11.7 acres of employment land at Earl Road, Handforth (the Site), following a marketing exercise which generated seventeen offers from fourteen bidders.

The Committee noted the detailed bid analysis undertaken by the Council’s agents, CBRE (commercial property agent), including adjustments to reflect abnormal cost deductions and Biodiversity Net Gain risks. Members further noted that Kier Property Developments Ltd had submitted the highest and most advantageous offer on all assessed bases, subject to pre?contract technical due diligence. It was reported that the site had been declared surplus to requirements, was allocated for employment uses in the Local Plan, and that disposal would secure a significant capital receipt for the Council.

The Committee raised the following points/queries:

·         It was queried why external consultants were engaged to support the disposal of commercial assets, and assurance sought that this represented good value for money and could not be undertaken in?house.  In response, it was explained that the transactions involved were highly complex, required specialist valuation and due?diligence expertise, and occurred too infrequently to justify maintaining such specialist capacity within the Council.  Using external agents ensured bids were evaluated on a comparable basis, prevented risks such as inflated offers later reduced through due diligence, and demonstrated best value under Section 123. The approach was considered best practice, and conflicts of interest sometimes required the use of additional agents beyond the Council’s retained adviser.

·         No members wished to move into Part 2.

An amendment, which was accepted as a friendly amendment, was put forward in relation to recommendation 1, as set out below.

Amendment 1 – Recommendation 1

Delegate authority to the Director of Growth and Enterprise to dispose of the Site on terms and conditions to be agreed in consultation with the Director of Law and Governance, the Executive Director of Resources (S151), and the appropriate Chair or Portfolio Holder, as appropriate.

A second amendment, which was accepted as a friendly amendment, was put forward in relation to recommendation 2, as set out below.

Amendment 2 – Recommendation 2

Delegate authority to the Director of Growth and Enterprise in consultation with the Director of Law and Governance, the Executive Director of Resources (S151) and the appropriate Chair or Portfolio Holder, as appropriate, to complete all legal documentation required to complete the disposal of the Site.

RESOLVED (Unanimously):

That the Finance Sub-Committee:

1.    Delegate authority to the Director of Growth and Enterprise to dispose of the Site on terms and conditions to be agreed in consultation with the Director of Law and Governance, the Executive Director of Resources (S151), and the appropriate Chair or Portfolio Holder, as appropriate; and

2.    Delegate authority to the Director of Growth and Enterprise in consultation with the Director of Law and Governance, the Executive Director of Resources (S151) and the appropriate Chair or Portfolio Holder, as appropriate, to complete all legal documentation required to complete the disposal of the Site.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Moss Lane, Macclesfield from the junction on London Road to the junction of Rutland Road for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Moss Lane, Macclesfield from the junction on London Road to the junction of Rutland Road for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

The committee considered a report on the proposed changes to the Household Waste Recycling Centre Booking System.  The committee were advised on the need for flexibility in managing the booking system, particularly where congestion and safety issues had arisen. It was noted that  any changes would not reduce the overall capacity of the service to meet demand.

The committee noted that a range of options were being considered on a site-by-site basis, including extending or removing booking requirements at certain times, adjusting queue management arrangements, and trialling alternative approaches, particularly at Macclesfield site.

The committee were updated on the extensive modelling that had informed the original decisions and noted that a further assessment would take place once the full mobile Household Waste Recycling Centre service was operational. It was clarified that the mobile Household Waste Recycling Centre was intended to improve access in rural areas and areas with lower car ownership, and that these would be integrated into the existing booking system.

The committee noted that liaison with highways continued, and that extending booking arrival windows was an option under consideration. It was also confirmed that the booking system could, if necessary, be removed altogether at certain sites as part of the site-by-site assessment of options.

The committee highlighted ongoing fly tipping issues and stressed the importance of ensuring that any changes to the booking system did not inadvertently increase illegal waste disposal. The committee noted that fly tipping was being addressed through partnership working with enforcement teams and external agencies, and that overall incidents had reduced, although localised issues remained.

An amendment was proposed, seconded, and subsequently accepted as a friendly amendment as set out below:

1. Delegate authority to the Director of Planning and Environment to make alterations to the HWRC booking system to account for health and safety and traffic congestion issues at HWRC ‘in consultation with Chair, Vice Chair and Opposition Spokesman of Committee’.

RESOLVED (by majority):

That the Environment and Communities Committee

1. Delegate authority to the Director of Planning and Environment to make alterations to the HWRC booking system to account for health and safety and traffic congestion issues at HWRCs in consultation with Chair, Vice Chair and Opposition Spokesman of Committee.

The committee considered the report in relation to the implementation of the initiatives brought forward under the Strategic Leisure Review. The committee noted the progress made, including delivery of elements of the capital programme. The committee were advised that due to changes in procurement legislation introduced in 2025, the council would be required to recommission the leisure contract prior to its expiry in 2029.

The committee debated the appropriateness of delegating authority without clearly setting out the available options, providing a detailed financial appraisal of those options. It was noted that, given the council’s current financial position, such analysis was particularly important. The committee debated whether a decision in relation to  the future of the Holmes Chapel Leisure Centre was needed, however the majority of Members were of the view that the decision making should not be delayed due to financial pressures facing both the council and the leisure operator.

It was clarified that the disposal of Holmes Chapel Leisure Centre was one of several options being explored. Officers were working with the school, Everybody Health and Leisure, the Town Council, and other key stakeholders to explore alternatives that would enable the facility to remain open. It was clarified that the proposed delegation would allow officers to proceed with disposal inline with the previously agreed policy direction should the options being considered not be viable. 

RESOLVED (by majority):

That the Environment and Communities Committee

1. Note the progress relating to the implementation of the Strategic Leisure Review.

2. Delegate authority to the Director of Planning and Environment to make any decisions regarding the future of Holmes Chapel.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Weston Road, Weston and Crewe Green from the junction of Savoy Road Weston Road Roundabout to the entrance to Crewe Hall for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Weston Road, Weston and Crewe Green from the junction of Savoy Road Weston Road Roundabout to the entrance to Crewe Hall for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited and reversed to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure and temporary reversal of one-way system order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit/reverse traffic on the below mentioned roads within Cheshire East for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

1.    Temporary Prohibition of traffic-

King Street, Knutsford

For the full extent

Princess Street, Knutsford

For the full extent

Wheelock Street, Middlewich

For the full extent

2.    Reversal of One-Way System

Darlington Street, Middlewich

For the full extent

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited and reversed to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure and temporary reversal of one-way system order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit/reverse traffic on the below mentioned roads within Cheshire East for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

1.    Temporary Prohibition of traffic-

King Street, Knutsford

For the full extent

Princess Street, Knutsford

For the full extent

Wheelock Street, Middlewich

For the full extent

2.    Reversal of One-Way System

Darlington Street, Middlewich

For the full extent

Being satisfied that traffic should be suspended to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary no right turn order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to suspend right turn on the below mentioned roads within Cheshire East for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

University Way, Crewe

Right turn into The Rookery Pub

University Way, Crewe

Right turn onto Duchy Road

Duchy Road, Crewe

Right turn onto University Way

Being satisfied that traffic should be suspended to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary no right turn order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to suspend right turn on the below mentioned roads within Cheshire East for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

University Way, Crewe

Right turn into The Rookery Pub

University Way, Crewe

Right turn onto Duchy Road

Duchy Road, Crewe

Right turn onto University Way

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on the below mentioned roads within Cheshire East for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

STATION ROAD, ODD RODE

For its full extent

BIRCH TREE LANE, ODD RODE

For its full extent

DRUMBER LANE, ODD RODE

For its full extent

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on the below mentioned roads within Cheshire East for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

STATION ROAD, ODD RODE

For its full extent

BIRCH TREE LANE, ODD RODE

For its full extent

DRUMBER LANE, ODD RODE

For its full extent

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure and suspension of one-way order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Cross Street, Alsager for its full extent for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure and suspension of one-way order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Cross Street, Alsager for its full extent for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Easter in Macclesfield to take place on Saturday 4^th April 2026.

MARKET PLACE, MACCLESFIELD

For its full extent

CHESTERGATE, MACCLESFIELD

From the junction of Churchill Way to the junction of Market Place

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Easter in Macclesfield to take place on Saturday 4^th April 2026.

MARKET PLACE, MACCLESFIELD

For its full extent

CHESTERGATE, MACCLESFIELD

From the junction of Churchill Way to the junction of Market Place

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Cheshire Spring Half Marathon to take place on Sunday 15^th March 2026.

LOCATION

Flittogate Lane, Pickmere

From the entrance of Cheshire show ground to the junction of Pickmere Lane

Pickmere Lane, Tabley Superior

From the junction of Flittogate Lane to the junction of Hall Lane

Hall Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Pickmere Lane to the junction of Frog Lane

Frog Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Hall lane to the junction of Park Lane

Park Lane, Aston By Budworth

From the junction of Frog lane to the junction of Hield Lane

Hield Lane, Aston by Budworth

 From the junction of Park Lane to the junction of Westgate Lane

Budworth Road, Aston By Budworth

From the junction of Westgate Lane to the entrance of Heyrose Golf Club

Frog Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Budworth Road to the Junction of School lane

School Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Frog Lane to the junction of Pickmere Lane

Cann Lane, Aston By Budworth

From the junction of Budworth Road to Limit

Whitley Lane, High Legh

From Cann lane to the junction of Rowley Bank Lane

Rowley Bank Lane, High Legh

From the junction of Whitley Lane to the junction of Halliwells Brow

Golborne Lane, High Legh

From the junction of Rowley Bank Lane to the junction of Northwood Lane

Northwood Lane, High Legh

From the junction of Golborne Lane to the junction of Whitley Lane

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Cheshire Spring Half Marathon to take place on Sunday 15^th March 2026.

LOCATION

Flittogate Lane, Pickmere

From the entrance of Cheshire show ground to the junction of Pickmere Lane

Pickmere Lane, Tabley Superior

From the junction of Flittogate Lane to the junction of Hall Lane

Hall Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Pickmere Lane to the junction of Frog Lane

Frog Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Hall lane to the junction of Park Lane

Park Lane, Aston By Budworth

From the junction of Frog lane to the junction of Hield Lane

Hield Lane, Aston by Budworth

 From the junction of Park Lane to the junction of Westgate Lane

Budworth Road, Aston By Budworth

From the junction of Westgate Lane to the entrance of Heyrose Golf Club

Frog Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Budworth Road to the Junction of School lane

School Lane, Pickmere

From the junction of Frog Lane to the junction of Pickmere Lane

Cann Lane, Aston By Budworth

From the junction of Budworth Road to Limit

Whitley Lane, High Legh

From Cann lane to the junction of Rowley Bank Lane

Rowley Bank Lane, High Legh

From the junction of Whitley Lane to the junction of Halliwells Brow

Golborne Lane, High Legh

From the junction of Rowley Bank Lane to the junction of Northwood Lane

Northwood Lane, High Legh

From the junction of Golborne Lane to the junction of Whitley Lane

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Sandbach Transport Festival to take place on Saturday 25 April 2026 and Sunday 26 April 2026.

The following roads will be closed on Saturday 25 April 2026 at the times specified.

THE COMMONS, SANDBACH (06:00-16:00)

For its full extent

MARKET SQUARE, SANDBACH (08:00-23:59)

For its full extent

The following roads will be closed on Sunday 26 April 2026 at the times specified.

THE COMMONS, SANDBACH (06:00-18:00)

For its full extent

MARKET SQUARE, SANDBACH (00:00-17:30)

For its full extent

HIGH STREET, SANDBACH (07:00-17:30)

For its full extent

CONGLETON ROAD, SANDBACH (09:00-17:30)

From the junction Hightown to the junction of Offley Road

HIGHTOWN, SANDBACH (09:00-17:30)

From Hightown Roundabout to the junction of Congleton Road

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Sandbach Transport Festival to take place on Saturday 25 April 2026 and Sunday 26 April 2026.

The following roads will be closed on Saturday 25 April 2026 at the times specified.

THE COMMONS, SANDBACH (06:00-16:00)

For its full extent

MARKET SQUARE, SANDBACH (08:00-23:59)

For its full extent

The following roads will be closed on Sunday 26 April 2026 at the times specified.

THE COMMONS, SANDBACH (06:00-18:00)

For its full extent

MARKET SQUARE, SANDBACH (00:00-17:30)

For its full extent

HIGH STREET, SANDBACH (07:00-17:30)

For its full extent

CONGLETON ROAD, SANDBACH (09:00-17:30)

From the junction Hightown to the junction of Offley Road

HIGHTOWN, SANDBACH (09:00-17:30)

From Hightown Roundabout to the junction of Congleton Road

Being satisfied that traffic should be restricted  to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary 30mph speed restriction order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to restrict traffic on Croxton Lane, Middlewich from the junction of Nursery Close, Middlewich to the Highway Boundary of Cheshire West and Chester  for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be restricted  to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary 30mph speed restriction order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to restrict traffic on Croxton Lane, Middlewich from the junction of Nursery Close, Middlewich to the Highway Boundary of Cheshire West and Chester  for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Knutsford Makers Market 2026 to take place on Sunday 1^st February 2026

PRINCESS STREET, KNUSFORD

For its full extent

To make a temporary road closure order in relation to the below mentioned roads under section 21 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 to close streets listed in the Schedule to the order to enable the Knutsford Makers Market 2026 to take place on Sunday 1^st February 2026

PRINCESS STREET, KNUSFORD

For its full extent

Being satisfied that traffic should be restricted to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary 30MPH Speed Restriction order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to restrict traffic on Pickmere Lane,Tabley Superior for it’s full extent for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be restricted to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary 30MPH Speed Restriction order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to restrict traffic on Pickmere Lane,Tabley Superior for it’s full extent for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary 30MPH Speed Restriction order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to restrict traffic on Budworth Road, Tabley Superior From the junction of Budworth Road, Aston by Budworth to the junction of Pickmere Lane, Tabley Superior for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary 30MPH Speed Restriction order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to restrict traffic on Budworth Road, Tabley Superior From the junction of Budworth Road, Aston by Budworth to the junction of Pickmere Lane, Tabley Superior for a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Union Street, Crewe at the Junction of Mill Street. For a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner.

Being satisfied that traffic should be prohibited to facilitate works, to give public notice of and make a temporary road closure order under s14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, and all other enabling powers to prohibit traffic on Union Street, Crewe at the Junction of Mill Street. For a period of 18 months or until the works have been completed, whichever is the sooner

The committee considered a report seeking approval to proceed with the recommissioning of Complex Needs Services in Cheshire East.

It was noted that the recommission was looking to promote individual independence and to provide users with support within their communities. It was noted that the existing services were provided by two frameworks and the recommission was required as the current frameworks would expire in 2027, and there was a requirement to ensure that services would remain in place to comply with the council’s statutory duties.

Members were updated that engagement with advocates, carers and providers would be the first stage of the process, with events scheduled, and officers expected this stage to run until the end of April 2026. At this point there would be feedback from users and the views of providers on what was required. From May 2026 onwards, a model based on the feedback would be developed, and officers would present a report to Members in September 2026 to specify the type of procurement and models developed, which would need to be in place by 1 April 2027.

It was noted that there was a need to approach the new commissioning with view of the council’s financial position, its transformation programme, and to work with the market to ensure that support offered was in line with the individual needs, and the types of accommodation needed going forwards.

Members were updated that a wide range of consultation and engagement events would be planned with those who use the services, including advocates, cares, families and the provider market, and to ensure that there was an established supply and evidence-based model to meet needs. It was noted that as part of process, a multidisciplinary project group would be established to ensure coproduction of services and work in collaboration with people who use the services, and members would be kept up to date with the progress. It was noted that service users could also be invited to join the project group.

It was noted that as a result of the recommissioning, there would likely be no significant change to the number of individuals supported, but the type of services provided may change – including more “person centred” and independent living options. As part of engagement, officers would be engaging fully with individuals in transition to adult services.

It was noted that most of the services commissioned were delivered within the borough, however this was not always possible to deliver due to the complexity and rarity of some services. It was noted that officers would work with registered social landlords who provide accommodation to ensure that they were aware of the council’s need to ensure that service users were based as close to home as possible. However, it was noted that some users received specialist care which was delivered by a neighbouring authority due to the number of other councils which surround Cheshire East, and for some users, being out of the borough was a good solution – if they had family somewhere, etc. It was noted that not all care homes wanted to accept clients who had learning difficulties due to the specialist care required. It was noted that a number of individuals from outside of Cheshire East received care within the borough. It was noted that users who were in receipt of treatment outside of their borough would remain responsibility of the local authority unless they were sectioned under mental health act or required additional further support, which would become the responsibility of the local authority where they were living.

It was noted that there was a separate workstream going on to look in to how best direct payments could be used and how they can be made more attractive to users.

RESOLVED: (by majority)

That the Adults and Health Committee:

1.               Approve the commencement of work on recommissioning Complex Needs Services.

Prior to presenting the report the officer clarified for the committee that, following recent changes to parish boundaries, the public footpath referred to in the report as Basford Footpath 1 was now designated as Weston Crewe Green Footpath 31. For the purposes of the meeting, it would continue to be referred to by the name used in the report, Basford Footpath 2. Any order subsequently made to extinguish the paths, as set out in the recommendations, would use the updated official footpath names.

The committee considered a report which outlined the investigation into a proposed extinguishment of Public Footpath Basford No.2 and Public Footpath Weston and Crewe Green No. 17 (part) in the Parish of Weston and Crewe Green (“Basford FP2; Weston & Crewe Green 17 (part)”) following receipt of an application from Taylor Wimpey Homes North West under the provisions of Section 257 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

The report summarised the consultations undertaken, including any objections received and considered the relevant legal tests. The report addressed both the public interest and the interests of affected landowners and described the proposed new route with reference to accompanying plans.

It was recommended that a Public Path Order was made under Section 257 of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 on the grounds that Cheshire East Borough Council (“the Council”) was satisfied that the extinguishment was necessary to enable the approved development to be constructed.

The ward members, Weston and Crewe Green Parish Council, user groups, statutory undertakers, and the councils Nature Conservation Officer had been consulted, with four responses received.

Two of the four responses made (The Peak & Northern Footpath society and Cadent Gas) had raised objections to the proposal. Both objections were withdrawn and there were currently no objections to the proposal.

Members sought clarification on future connectivity and crossing points.  In response officers reported that Network Rail discussions were noted but fell outside the red line of the specific application being considered.

The committee considered the evidence set out within the report and agreed that a Public Path Extinguishment Order is made under Section 257 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for Basford FP2; Weston & Crewe Green 17 (part) as shown on Plan No. TCPA082 in the report on the grounds that Cheshire East Borough Council is satisfied that it is necessary to do so to enable the construction of an approved development.

RESOLVED: (By Majority)

That the Highways and Transport Committee

1. Approve that a Public Path Extinguishment Order is made under Section 257 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for Basford FP2; Weston & Crewe Green 17 (part) as shown on Plan No. TCPA082 to the report on the grounds that Cheshire East Borough Council is satisfied that it is necessary to do so to enable the construction of an approved development.

2. Approve that public notice of the making of the Order be given and that, in the event no objections are received within the statutory notice period, the Order be confirmed in the exercise of the powers conferred on the Council by the said Act.

3. Note that should any objections be received, Cheshire East Borough Council will be responsible for the conduct of any hearing or Public Inquiry relating to the Order.

It was noted that Councillors G. Marshall and B. Wye had not completed the required Public Rights of Way training and therefore were permitted to observe the item but were not able to take part in the debate or vote on it.

The committee considered a report which outlined an application made in October 2017 for an order to part upgrade Footpath No.6 Ashley to a Bridleway shown between points A-B on Plan WCA/056 (“the Plan”) (Appendix 1 to the report).

The report assessed the submitted evidence and made a recommendation in accordance with the duty set out under Section 53 (2) (b) of the 1981 Act, following the occurrence of an event under Section 53(3)(c)(ii), namely that a highway shown in the map and statement as a highway of a particular description ought to be there shown as a highway of a different description. This was set out in detail at Appendix 2 to the report.

The evidence in support of the application consisted primarily of user evidence forms from 10 people. Route A-B on the Plan was alleged to have been used by the public during periods between 1996 – 2016 on foot and by bicycle. This could meet the test for a reasonable allegation of public rights under Section 53 (3)(c)(ii).

The investigation also considered maps and plans from the nineteenth century and the records of the DM. The documents were not conclusive in establishing additional rights of way.

The evidence was assessed against the statutory tests set out under the 1981 Act and the “the 1980 Act. Submissions from landowners relate to a later period than the claimed use. Based on the user evidence covering a twenty-year period prior to 1996 and 2016, it was considered on the balance of probabilities, that a public bridleway did not subsist between points A-B on the Plan.

The committee agreed to refuse the application on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to overturn the legal presumption that the Definitive Map and Statement were correct.

RESOLVED: (By majority)

That the Highways and Transport Committee

1.    Refuse to make a Definitive Map Modification Order for the route A - B on Plan WCA/056 at Appendix 1 to the report.

The committee considered a report on the Decision to Let a Construction Contract for the Middlewich Eastern Bypass.

The Middlewich Eastern Bypass scheme would improve the highway network in Middlewich by relieving congestion and road safety concerns in Middlewich town centre, improving journey times in mid Cheshire and enabling the full development of Strategic Location LPS 44 (Midpoint 18) in the adopted Local Plan Strategy. The Scheme, which was partly in Cheshire West and Chester, will support the economic growth of the Cheshire and Warrington sub-region.

A Target Cost for the construction phase of the scheme had been agreed with the Contractor at £53.8M. This included the full scope of the Cledford Lane element and would take advantage of a shorter programme taking account of new information on ground conditions and starting as early in the Spring as possible.

The Target cost programme and cost assumes that certain time sensitive elements are undertaken in February and March in advance of the formal construction contract being entered into.

The updated total cost estimate, inclusive of risk, property and sunk costs was contained in restricted Appendix C.

Whilst it remained within the MTFS budget envelope, to maximise the available risk allowance at the start of the project a decision to proceed with the full scope of the Cledford Lane element of the scheme would be deferred until later in the construction phase. The potential savings associated with the value engineering option were set out in restricted Appendix C.

Councillor G Marshall, speaking in his role as the ward councillor for Middlewich, asked what impact the opening of the Bypass would have on Lewin Street and Leadsmithy Street.

Officers confirmed that reduced traffic flows were anticipated. There would be post?implementation checks required and complimentary measures planned.

Councillor G Marshall left the meeting and did not return.

RESOLVED: (Unanimously)

That the Highways and Transport Committee

1. Delegate authority to the Executive Director of Place in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of the committee or appropriate Cabinet Member(s) to:

(a) enter Stage 2 of the construction contract under the SCAPE framework

(b) attend to any matters ancillary to entering Stage 2 as noted above

(c) agree any variations to the Construction Contract in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of this committee or appropriate Cabinet Member(s)

2. Agree that the Head of Infrastructure to be appointed as the Project Manager under the Contract.

3. Authorise the Head of Infrastructure to instruct the Contractor to bring forward the works set out in Appendix A into Stage 1 of the Contract to allow delivery prior to a formal award of contract.

4. Authorise the initial Cledford Lane Value engineering design is incorporated into the project programme for initial delivery – as shown in Appendix B of the report.

5. Delegate to the Executive Director of Place in consultation, with the Chair and Vice Chair of the committee or appropriate Cabinet Member(s) the timing and contractual arrangements for the further Cledford Lane elements of the scheme.

6. Approve that the Executive Director of Place explore other options to secure additional funding to support the scheme contingency budget and full delivery of Cledford Lane via the Combined Authority.

7. Note the Programme, assumptions, full estimated budget and risk allowance for the scheme as contained in restricted Appendix C to the report.

8. Note the requirement to implement the Compulsory Purchase Order, including for the full delivery of Cledford Lane and the linked land property agreements prior to the formal Stage 2 construction contract.